New York governor leads angry reaction to ‘outrageous’ Supreme Court decision making it easier to carry handguns

New York City’s mayor joined the criticism, saying the decision has ‘opened additional river feeding the sea of gun violence’

Andrew Buncombe
Seattle
Thursday 23 June 2022 19:34
Comments
New York governor condemns Supreme Court's ruling on concealed-carry law

New York’s governor has attacked an “outrageous” Supreme Court ruling that makes it easier to carry handguns in public - and which has wider implications for the entire country.

The Supreme Court — examining a case originating in New York — ruled for the first time that the US Constitution protects an individual’s right to carry a handgun in public for self-defence. Governor Kathy Hochul said the decision was “outrageous”, particularly as it came at a time of “national reckoning on gun violence”.

Her comments were a reference to the increased demand for gun regulation in the wake of mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas.

“In response to this ruling, we are closely reviewing our options — including calling a special session of the legislature,” she tweeted.

“Just as we swiftly passed nation-leading gun reform legislation, I will continue to do everything in my power to keep New Yorkers safe from gun violence.”

Her comments were echoed by many in the state, as well as the city of New York, and across the nation, at a time when a grass-roots effort has helped set the way for the first serious bipartistan gun regulation legisation to be passed by Congress in three decades.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams said the ruling “will put New Yorkers at further risk of gun violence”.

“This decision may have opened an additional river feeding the sea of gun violence, but we will do everything we can to dam it.”

Congressman Ritchie Torre, a Democrat who represents New York’s 15th congressional district, said: “The Supreme Court’s decision will deepen the crisis of gun violence in NYC and beyond.”

He added: “Striking down the proper cause requirement, as SCOTUS has done, means allowing the average person a right to carry a gun in public, even in a city as densely populated as NY.”

Giffords, the gun control organisation established by former congresswoman Gabby Giffords after he was nearly assassinated by a gunman, said that as “gun violence has reached a historic high, this ruling imposes the gun lobby’s dangerous ‘guns everywhere’ agenda on all of us”.

It added: “Gun extremists wanted to open the floodgates on the public carry of firearms. We asked the Supreme Court to choose public safety and historical precedent. SCOTUS chose gun extremism instead.”

Kris Brown, President of the gun control group Brady, established in honour of Ronald Reagan’s press secretary James Brady, who was paralysed in the 1981 gun attack that nearly killed the president, tweeted as the decision was dropped: “We are still reading through this disastrous SCOTUS decision”

She added: “But one thing is clear: Our safety from gun violence is at grave risk.”

Kamala Harris warns 'a lot at stake' if Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade

Thursday’s 6-3 ruling in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc v. Bruen, found the court’s conservative justices in the majority and liberal justices in dissent.

It struck down New York state’s limits on carrying concealed handguns outside the home, arguing that The court found that the law, enacted in 1913, violated a person’s right to “keep and bear arms” under the US Constitution’s Second Amendment.

The ruling, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, declared that the Constitution protects “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home”.

Mr Thomas added: “We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need.”

The new ruling underscored how the 6-3 conservative majority on the court is sympathetic to an expansive reading of Second Amendment rights.

Under the New York law’s “proper cause” requirement, applicants seeking unrestricted concealed carry permits must convince a state firearms licensing officer of an actual, rather than speculative, need for self-defense. Officials could also grant licenses restricted to certain activities, such as hunting or target practice.

The ruling could lead to many more people securing the licenses to carry concealed handguns in the state, undermine similar restrictions in other states and imperil other types of state and local firearms restrictions nationwide by requiring judges to scrutinise them with a more skeptical eye under the Constitution.

Later, Ms Hochul said she was pressing ahead with plans to sign into law a new measure that would require school districts to consider installing silent panic alarms that directly alert law enforcement.

The so-called “Alyssa's Law” is named in honour of Alyssa Alhadeff, who was killed in the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida in 2018.

“Today, the Supreme Court is sending us backward in our efforts to protect families and prevent gun violence,” the governor said, speaking to reporters.

“This decision isn’t just reckless, it’s reprehensible. It’s not what New Yorkers want.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James said: “Today’s decision by the Supreme Court to strike down New York’s proper cause requirement to carry a concealed weapon is incredibly disappointing.

“For more than a century, this law has protected New Yorkers from harm by ensuring that there are reasonable and appropriate regulations for guns in public spaces.”

She added: “The Supreme Court made its decision, but the fight to protect American families from gun violence will march on.”

Additional reporting by Reuters

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in